Is-it someone you know, individuals the sender try matchmaking, or unknown people?

Is-it someone you know, individuals the sender try matchmaking, or unknown people?

Although we understand somewhat in regards to the frequency and correlates of adolescent sexting, research providing in-depth insight into social contexts of your attitude is within their infancy. The majority of the present investigation on sexting enjoys tended to concentrate on what is happening without why, promoting a need for scholarship targeted at building idea. Indeed, Chalfen ( 2010 ) debated that one essential future path for analysis on teenage sexting was qualitative work which could incorporate understanding of teens’ motives for sexting. The current study takes a step in this direction with a qualitative review with the social contexts of teenage sexting in the USA. Desire to were to enhance the existing US-based quantitative facts on teenage sexting, and also to use these insights to share with the generation of hypotheses to steer potential study in this region. Attracting from motifs during the data talked about above, we registered this job with three data concerns.

With RQ1, we sought for in order to comprehend the types of affairs wherein adolescents might submit, obtain, or trade sexts, in order to build insight into the reasons that advise sexting during these relational contexts. RQ2 got directed at comprehending the level to which teens discover sexting as appropriate, as well as uncovering many of the rationales enlightening these feedback. Ultimately, RQ3 shown our fascination with examining possible gender and years variations in the relational and normative contexts of teenage sexting.


Information because of this research entailed feedback to unrestricted composed surveys that have been applied during focus teams in three various US places included in the a€?Teens and Mobile Phonesa€? job from the Pew net and American lifetime basis and the institution of Michigan (Lenhart, Ling, Campbell, & Purcell, 2010 ). During the focus groups, players comprise expected to expend 20a€“30 moments in private, confidentially, and anonymously supplying authored feedback to some open-ended questions relating to sexting, along with other subjects that were perhaps not an element of the current study. This approach was actually consumed in purchase to mitigate the possibility of any vexation that ongst other teens, and gain endorsement from Pew’s investigation lover institution’s Institutional Analysis panel.


Individuals were strategically hired by a 3rd party firm to make sure the right stability old, sex, battle, socioeconomic updates, and people occurrence. Fifty-one teens participated in these focus teams therefore finished the questionnaire. Individuals ranged in get older from 12 to 18 age (M = , SD = 1.83), with a decent stability of many years in this range (32 percent, 12a€“13 decades; 37 per cent, 14a€“15 ages; 32 percent, 16a€“18 age). All surveys had been completed between ple provides a straight gender ratio with twenty-six males and twenty-five women. Twenty-two participants comprise from metropolitan Atlanta, fourteen were from metropolitan Denver, and fifteen were from metropolitan new york.


Q: perhaps you have delivered or was given an image or movie on the cell that requires nudity, in addition often called a€?sextinga€?? Describe how often this happens and exactly who sends these images (without providing labels).

Q: Ever delivered these photos or video clip with your mobile phone? If yes, the thing that was the situation?

As observed previous, these questions had been element of a larger nationwide Pew study (Lenhart et al., 2010 ). Where sense, today’s research is actually a second research of existing facts. Even though issues are not particularly crafted because of this report, they give chances to tackle the core studies concerns. 1

Categories and themes are assessed making use of components of Hammersley and Atkinson’s ( 1995 ) structure for analyzing qualitative information. Very first, both authors carefully read and re-read every transcripts being acquainted all of them. After reading the transcripts, portions for the feedback had been reassembled and grouped relating to two wide habits reflecting aspects of RQ1 and RQ2 defined above. Subsequently each structure was evaluated and refined into firmer stuff of consistencies. Using these thematic kinds set up, 1st writer looked for stories and quotations that most readily useful illustrate all of them. Finally, a validity check was executed by second creator, just who examined the findings and supplied your final rounded of fine-tuning.

Leave a Comment