Personal Desirability Scale
, 2016) is actually a personal-statement size, that have 20 pieces of dichotomous reaction (yes/no), confirmed for the a long time within attempt. Example items is “Have you ever detested people?” and you can “Maybe you have cheated anybody?” Before analysis analyses, every users was in fact processed to have public desirability, governing aside teens which scored over Yards = , as they demonstrated a tendency to broadcast socially desirable responses as an alternative than just choosing answers which might be a true reflection of its habits or thinking (Grimm, 2010). Cronbach’s alpha to own total measure is.80.
Abusive Sexting
Adolescents was asked several questions relating to sexting behaviors: (a) abusive sexting: “Maybe you’ve common sexually direct photo otherwise video clips regarding almost every other anybody instead the consent?”; and you will (b) abusive sexting victimization: “Provides intimately direct photographs otherwise video clips of oneself ever already been common with others as opposed to your concur?.” Solutions was in fact rated as 0 = No, step 1 = Yes.
Teens Notice Declaration
Young people care about declaration (YSR; Achenbach and you will Rescorla, 2001; Portuguese adaptation: Goncalves ainsi que al., 2007). New YSR try a personal-report questionnaire readily available for school-many years pupils and you can teens (many years eleven?18) to find self-evaluations from mental, behavioural, and societal issues. Goods are rated toward an effective around three-section level (0 = untrue, step 1 = slightly otherwise both correct, and you may dos = most evident otherwise usually true), in accordance with the before six months. In this research, new syndromes Nervous/Anxiety (13 products; elizabeth.g., “I’m meaningless otherwise inferior”; ? = 0.85), Personal Problems (eleven things; elizabeth.g., “Really don’t get along with almost every other infants”; ? = 0.78), Opposition (Signal Breaking) Decisions (sixteen circumstances; elizabeth.grams., “We clipped groups or disregard college”; ? = 0 http://www.datingrating.net/local-hookup/anaheim.60), and you will Competitive Behavior (17 things; elizabeth.g., “I destroy some thing owned by someone else”; ? = 0.84) were used. According to the requirements ideal because of the Ponterotto and you will Ruckdeschel (2007) about your adequacy away from inner consistency measures, and as a result of the limited leader property value Resistance Conclusion subscale (? = 0.60) while the quantity of products (16 issues), we decided to reduce which measure of mathematical investigation.
Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Attributes
Collection out of callous-unemotional characteristics [ICU; Essau et al., 2006; Portuguese adaptation from the Pechorro et al. (2014)]. The ICU is a survey made to evaluate callous and unemotional characteristics on a cuatro-part level between 0 (“Not really correct”) to 3 (“However real”). So it size has been utilized having medical and you can society types of youthfulness anywhere between very early adolescence so you’re able to late puberty/growing adulthood (a long time = 12–twenty years). Around three subscales were used: Uncaring (7 affairs; elizabeth.grams., “I cover up my personal feelings regarding anybody else”; ? = 0.86), Callousness (11 products; elizabeth.grams., “Really don’t care and attention which I hurt to acquire the things i want”; ? = 0.72), and you can Unemotional (four issues; “Personally i think crappy or responsible once i take action wrong”; ? = 0.43). Regardless if a low value of leader might be on account of a beneficial reasonable amount of concerns (Nunnally, 1978), we chose to treat so it level regarding comparative statistical research.
Teens Upheaval Survey
Young people traumatization questionnaire [CTQ; Bernstein et al., 2003; Portuguese adaptation because of the Dias ainsi que al. (2013)]. New CTQ try a great twenty-eight-item questionnaire aimed to help you assess mind-advertised young people injury record during the adolescent and you may mature communities (away from a dozen years of age). Answers was counted with the a beneficial 5-area Likert measure setting step one (“Never ever genuine”) so you’re able to 5 (“Very often correct”). Young people shock is actually counted having fun with five subscales: Emotional punishment (e.g., “I was thinking that my moms and dads wished I had not ever been produced”; ? = 0.81), Mental neglect (elizabeth.g., “We noticed enjoyed”; ? = 0.82), Sexual punishment (elizabeth.g., “In my opinion which i is actually sexually mistreated”; ? = 0.89), Real punishment (age.grams., “In my opinion that we is truly abused”; ? = 0.83), and Physical overlook (e.grams., “There isn’t sufficient to eat”; ? = 0.60). Per subscale includes four facts, and you will a supplementary around three items are intended to measure any desire to reduce or deny new discipline.